§ 3513

Citation: § 3513
Parent Document: Gombiner v. Swartz, 167 Cal. App. 4th 1365 (2008)
Jurisdiction: California (state)
Effective Date: 2008-10-29
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2259791/gombiner-v-swartz/ ↗

Full Text

813 chars

Tenant’s conclusion does not follow because landlord argued at trial that tenant violated the settlement agreement in two ways. The first was by anonymously complaining to the Department of Building and Safety about the property’s condition after entering into the settlement agreement. The second was by interfering with landlord’s attempt to restore the building to a single-family residence. As part of the restoration, landlord had complied with an order from the Department of Building and Safety that he remove the door between the two residential units. Tenant admitted at trial, however, to reinstalling the door. Landlord argued at trial that tenant’s reinstallation of the door breached tenant’s obligation not to interfere with landlord’s efforts to. return the property to a single-family residence. 5

Other Sections in This Document (66)

Full Text