Gombiner v. Swartz, 167 Cal. App. 4th 1365 (2008)
- Citation
- Gombiner v. Swartz, 167 Cal. App. 4th 1365 (2008)
- Parent Document
- Gombiner v. Swartz, 167 Cal. App. 4th 1365 (2008)
- Jurisdiction
- California (state)
- Effective Date
- 2008-10-29
Other Sections in This Document (66)
- Gombiner v. Swartz, 167 Cal. App. 4th 1365 (2008)
- Gombiner v. Swartz, 167 Cal. App. 4th 1365 (2008)
- Gombiner v. Swartz, 167 Cal. App. 4th 1365 (2008)
- Gombiner v. Swartz, 167 Cal. App. 4th 1365 (2008)
- Gombiner v. Swartz, 167 Cal. App. 4th 1365 (2008)
- Gombiner v. Swartz, 167 Cal. App. 4th 1365 (2008)
- Gombiner v. Swartz, 167 Cal. App. 4th 1365 (2008)
- Gombiner v. Swartz, 167 Cal. App. 4th 1365 (2008)
- Gombiner v. Swartz, 167 Cal. App. 4th 1365 (2008)
- Gombiner v. Swartz, 167 Cal. App. 4th 1365 (2008)
- Gombiner v. Swartz, 167 Cal. App. 4th 1365 (2008)
- Gombiner v. Swartz, 167 Cal. App. 4th 1365 (2008)
- Gombiner v. Swartz, 167 Cal. App. 4th 1365 (2008)
- Gombiner v. Swartz, 167 Cal. App. 4th 1365 (2008)
- Gombiner v. Swartz, 167 Cal. App. 4th 1365 (2008)
- Gombiner v. Swartz, 167 Cal. App. 4th 1365 (2008)
- Gombiner v. Swartz, 167 Cal. App. 4th 1365 (2008)
- Gombiner v. Swartz, 167 Cal. App. 4th 1365 (2008)
- Gombiner v. Swartz, 167 Cal. App. 4th 1365 (2008)
- Gombiner v. Swartz, 167 Cal. App. 4th 1365 (2008)
- Gombiner v. Swartz, 167 Cal. App. 4th 1365 (2008)
- Gombiner v. Swartz, 167 Cal. App. 4th 1365 (2008)
- Gombiner v. Swartz, 167 Cal. App. 4th 1365 (2008)
- Gombiner v. Swartz, 167 Cal. App. 4th 1365 (2008)
- Gombiner v. Swartz, 167 Cal. App. 4th 1365 (2008)
- Gombiner v. Swartz, 167 Cal. App. 4th 1365 (2008)
- Gombiner v. Swartz, 167 Cal. App. 4th 1365 (2008)
- Gombiner v. Swartz, 167 Cal. App. 4th 1365 (2008)
- Gombiner v. Swartz, 167 Cal. App. 4th 1365 (2008)
- Gombiner v. Swartz, 167 Cal. App. 4th 1365 (2008)
- Gombiner v. Swartz, 167 Cal. App. 4th 1365 (2008)
- Gombiner v. Swartz, 167 Cal. App. 4th 1365 (2008)
- § 3513
- § 3513
- § 3513
- § 3513
- § 3513
- § 3513
- § 3513
- § 3513
- § 3513
- § 3513
- § 3513
- § 3513
- § 3513
- § 3513
- § 3513
- § 3513
- § 3513
- § 3513
- § 3513
- § 3513
- § 3513
- § 3513
- § 3513
- § 3513
- § 3513
- § 3513
- § 3513
- § 3513
- § 3513
- § 3513
- § 3513
- § 3513
- § 3513
- § 3513
Full Text
566 charsIn February 2006, the parties stipulated to a bifurcated court and jury trial in the civil action before the Honorable Mary Ann Murphy, whose rulings and judgment are at issue in this appeal. As to nonjury matters, they agreed the trial court could rely on the parties’ briefs to decide the legality under the RSO of the rent increases in the February 2000 settlement agreement and lease amendments. They further agreed the court could decide based on the parties’ evidence whether landlord had restored the property to a single-family residence exempt from the RSO.