DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Section 425

Citation
Section 425
Parent Document
1100 PARK LANE ASSOCIATES v. Feldman, 74 Cal. Rptr. 3d 1 (2008)
Jurisdiction
California (state)
Effective Date
2008-02-25
Original Source
https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2279577/1100-park-lane-associates-v-feldman/ ↗

Other Sections in This Document (227)

Full Text

426 chars 
court then turned to the purposes of the litigation privilege and found they were not served by its application to the confidentiality agreement. Rather than encouraging finality and avoiding litigation, application of the privilege to allow comments to be made in litigation, contrary to the terms of the settlement agreement, “invites further litigation as to their accuracy and undermines the settlement.” (Wentland, supra,