DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

1100 PARK LANE ASSOCIATES v. Feldman, 74 Cal. Rptr. 3d 1 (2008)

Citation
1100 PARK LANE ASSOCIATES v. Feldman, 74 Cal. Rptr. 3d 1 (2008)
Parent Document
1100 PARK LANE ASSOCIATES v. Feldman, 74 Cal. Rptr. 3d 1 (2008)
Jurisdiction
California (state)
Effective Date
2008-02-25
Original Source
https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2279577/1100-park-lane-associates-v-feldman/ ↗

Other Sections in This Document (227)

Full Text

506 chars 
In addition to the facts set forth above, the Feldmans alleged that Park Lane cross-defendants had “embarked on a course of conduct designed to deny then-existing tenants of the Apartments the benefits accorded to such tenants under applicable state and local laws, including but not limited to the San Francisco Rent Stabilization and Arbitration Ordinance (hereinafter ‘Rent Ordinance’), in an illegal effort to increase the income received by Park Lane from tenants of the Apartments.” Anti-SLAPP motion