DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Section 425

Citation
Section 425
Parent Document
1100 PARK LANE ASSOCIATES v. Feldman, 74 Cal. Rptr. 3d 1 (2008)
Jurisdiction
California (state)
Effective Date
2008-02-25
Original Source
https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2279577/1100-park-lane-associates-v-feldman/ ↗

Other Sections in This Document (227)

Full Text

486 chars 
at p. 919, italics added.) The foregoing statement of the test cannot mean that the party resisting the assertion of the privilege can defeat the claim simply by asserting that litigation to which the statement is related is without merit, and therefore the proponent of the litigation could not in good faith have believed it had a legally viable claim. To adopt such an interpretation would virtually eradicate the litigation privilege for all but the most clearly meritorious claims.