DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Section 425

Citation
Section 425
Parent Document
1100 PARK LANE ASSOCIATES v. Feldman, 74 Cal. Rptr. 3d 1 (2008)
Jurisdiction
California (state)
Effective Date
2008-02-25
Original Source
https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2279577/1100-park-lane-associates-v-feldman/ ↗

Other Sections in This Document (227)

Full Text

424 chars 
41 Cal.4th at p. 1252, fn. omitted.) The court concluded that the test involves a “question of fact” and so made it “impossible to conclude, as the Court of Appeal did, that every action brought pursuant to the notice provision necessarily would be barred by the litigation privilege.” {Id. at p. 1251.) The Feldmans seize upon this portion of the Action Apartment holding to argue that whether service of the notice in this