DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Section 425

Citation
Section 425
Parent Document
1100 PARK LANE ASSOCIATES v. Feldman, 74 Cal. Rptr. 3d 1 (2008)
Jurisdiction
California (state)
Effective Date
2008-02-25
Original Source
https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2279577/1100-park-lane-associates-v-feldman/ ↗

Other Sections in This Document (227)

Full Text

632 chars 
of the communications and conduct providing the bases for the cross-complaint fell within the litigation privilege of Civil Code section 47. Specifically, Park Lane cross-defendants contend that all of the causes of action of the cross-complaint, and the resulting damages, are premised on three communicative acts covered by the litigation privilege: Hawkins’s June 24, 2005 conversation with the Feldmans, the service of the three-day notice to quit, and the filing of the unlawful detainer complaint. Park Lane cross-defendants assert that all these actions were taken in anticipation of, or in connection with, litigation. *1485