section 1942

Citation: section 1942
Parent Document: Rich v. Schwab, 63 Cal. App. 4th 803 (1998)
Jurisdiction: California (state)
Effective Date: 1998-04-30
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2252453/rich-v-schwab/ ↗

Other Sections in This Document (80)

Rich v. Schwab, 63 Cal. App. 4th 803 (1998)
Rich v. Schwab, 63 Cal. App. 4th 803 (1998)
Rich v. Schwab, 63 Cal. App. 4th 803 (1998)
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 3294

Full Text

411 chars

We hasten to add that where, as here, the penalties imposed amount to several hundred thousand dollars, some consideration of their cumulative impact on a landlord might be warranted. However, in the context of a statutory penalty, the issue of defendant’s financial condition will at most be a matter for the defendant to raise in mitigation. (See, e.g., State of California v. City and County of San Francisco