section 1942

Citation: section 1942
Parent Document: Rich v. Schwab, 63 Cal. App. 4th 803 (1998)
Jurisdiction: California (state)
Effective Date: 1998-04-30
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2252453/rich-v-schwab/ ↗

Other Sections in This Document (80)

Rich v. Schwab, 63 Cal. App. 4th 803 (1998)
Rich v. Schwab, 63 Cal. App. 4th 803 (1998)
Rich v. Schwab, 63 Cal. App. 4th 803 (1998)
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 3294

Full Text

427 chars

(1991) 232 Cal.App.3d 1352, 1358 [284 Cal.Rptr. 149].) (5c) Here, the maximum potential penalty for each violation, $1,000, is in no sense disproportionate to the annual rent collected on typical commercial, residential or agricultural leaseholds covered by the terms of section 1942.5 or disproportionate to the public interest in deterring retaliatory conduct by landlords. Given the relatively low limit imposed and the *817