section 1942

Citation: section 1942
Parent Document: Rich v. Schwab, 63 Cal. App. 4th 803 (1998)
Jurisdiction: California (state)
Effective Date: 1998-04-30
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2252453/rich-v-schwab/ ↗

Other Sections in This Document (80)

Rich v. Schwab, 63 Cal. App. 4th 803 (1998)
Rich v. Schwab, 63 Cal. App. 4th 803 (1998)
Rich v. Schwab, 63 Cal. App. 4th 803 (1998)
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 3294

Full Text

458 chars

stated: “The Mobilehome Residency Law, while covering some aspects of the relationship between mobilehome residents and mobilehome park owners, cannot reasonably be said to constitute a general and pervasive legislative scheme for the regulation of all aspects of mobilehome parks and residents.” (142 Cal.App.3d at p. 374.) Our conclusion is also consistent with the holding in Palmer v. Agee (1978) 87 Cal.App.3d 377 [150 Cal.Rptr. 841] (Palmer). In Palmer