section 1942
- Citation
- section 1942
- Parent Document
- Rich v. Schwab, 63 Cal. App. 4th 803 (1998)
- Jurisdiction
- California (state)
- Effective Date
- 1998-04-30
- Original Source
- https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2252453/rich-v-schwab/ ↗
Other Sections in This Document (80)
- Rich v. Schwab, 63 Cal. App. 4th 803 (1998)
- Rich v. Schwab, 63 Cal. App. 4th 803 (1998)
- Rich v. Schwab, 63 Cal. App. 4th 803 (1998)
- section 1942
- section 1942
- section 1942
- section 1942
- section 1942
- section 1942
- section 1942
- section 1942
- section 1942
- section 1942
- section 1942
- section 1942
- section 1942
- section 1942
- section 1942
- section 1942
- section 1942
- section 1942
- section 1942
- section 1942
- section 1942
- section 1942
- section 1942
- section 1942
- section 1942
- section 1942
- section 1942
- section 1942
- section 1942
- section 1942
- section 1942
- section 1942
- section 1942
- section 1942
- section 1942
- section 1942
- section 1942
- section 1942
- section 1942
- section 1942
- section 1942
- section 1942
- section 1942
- section 1942
- section 1942
- section 1942
- section 1942
- section 1942
- section 1942
- section 1942
- section 1942
- section 1942
- section 1942
- section 1942
- section 1942
- section 1942
- section 1942
- section 1942
- section 1942
- section 1942
- section 1942
- section 1942
- section 1942
- section 1942
- section 1942
- section 1942
- section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 3294
Full Text
399 charsat p. 110.) Accordingly, “the absence of evidence as to financial condition ‘frustrates a meaningful appellate review of punitive damage awards (i.e., of whether the award was “grossly disproportionate”), since the absence of evidence of net worth precludes an appellate court from deciding whether an award might, for example, bankrupt the defendant.’ ” (Id. at p. 114.) Thus, the court in Murakami