section 1942
- Citation
- section 1942
- Parent Document
- Rich v. Schwab, 63 Cal. App. 4th 803 (1998)
- Jurisdiction
- California (state)
- Effective Date
- 1998-04-30
- Original Source
- https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2252453/rich-v-schwab/ ↗
Other Sections in This Document (80)
- Rich v. Schwab, 63 Cal. App. 4th 803 (1998)
- Rich v. Schwab, 63 Cal. App. 4th 803 (1998)
- Rich v. Schwab, 63 Cal. App. 4th 803 (1998)
- section 1942
- section 1942
- section 1942
- section 1942
- section 1942
- section 1942
- section 1942
- section 1942
- section 1942
- section 1942
- section 1942
- section 1942
- section 1942
- section 1942
- section 1942
- section 1942
- section 1942
- section 1942
- section 1942
- section 1942
- section 1942
- section 1942
- section 1942
- section 1942
- section 1942
- section 1942
- section 1942
- section 1942
- section 1942
- section 1942
- section 1942
- section 1942
- section 1942
- section 1942
- section 1942
- section 1942
- section 1942
- section 1942
- section 1942
- section 1942
- section 1942
- section 1942
- section 1942
- section 1942
- section 1942
- section 1942
- section 1942
- section 1942
- section 1942
- section 1942
- section 1942
- section 1942
- section 1942
- section 1942
- section 1942
- section 1942
- section 1942
- section 1942
- section 1942
- section 1942
- section 1942
- section 1942
- section 1942
- section 1942
- section 1942
- section 1942
- section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 1942
- Section 3294
Full Text
421 charsAlthough the tenants requested attorney fees in their initial complaint, and although 423 of them established that they had moved because of the rent increase, the trial court nonetheless denied their request that attorney fees be awarded under section 1942.5, subdivision (g). In its judgment, the trial court found that none of the moving tenants had in fact been evicted within the meaning of the statute. We disagree.