section 1942

Citation: section 1942
Parent Document: Rich v. Schwab, 63 Cal. App. 4th 803 (1998)
Jurisdiction: California (state)
Effective Date: 1998-04-30
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2252453/rich-v-schwab/ ↗

Other Sections in This Document (80)

Rich v. Schwab, 63 Cal. App. 4th 803 (1998)
Rich v. Schwab, 63 Cal. App. 4th 803 (1998)
Rich v. Schwab, 63 Cal. App. 4th 803 (1998)
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 3294

Full Text

468 chars

noted: “ ‘It has long been the rule in this State that statutes relating to the same subject matter are to be construed together and harmonized if possible.’ [Citation.] In other words, ‘. . . it is not to be presumed that the legislature in the enactment of statutes intends to overthrow long-established principles of law unless such intention is made clearly to appear by either express declaration or by necessary implication.’ ” (Id. at p. 383.) C. Dawes’s Appeal