DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

section 11172

Citation
section 11172
Parent Document
P. ex rel. etc. v. Hebb (2017)
Jurisdiction
California (state)
Effective Date
2017-12-19
Original Source
https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/4453096/p-ex-rel-etc-v-hebb/ ↗

Other Sections in This Document (759)

Full Text

470 chars 
13  Defendants do not address whether the IFPA is a more specific statute than the
general litigation privilege, and instead focus their argument on whether application of
the privilege will render the IFPA “wholly inoperable.” We need not decide whether
applying the litigation privilege would completely render the IFPA inoperable because
we conclude, post, that the privilege would render it significantly inoperable. (Action
Apartment, supra, 41 Cal.4th at p. 1246.)