DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

section 11172

Citation
section 11172
Parent Document
P. ex rel. etc. v. Hebb (2017)
Jurisdiction
California (state)
Effective Date
2017-12-19
Original Source
https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/4453096/p-ex-rel-etc-v-hebb/ ↗

Other Sections in This Document (759)

Full Text

517 chars 
11  The lower federal courts have uniformly followed Komarova, supra,
175 Cal.App.4th 324 and rejected application of the litigation privilege to claims under
the Rosenthal Act. (E.g., Holmes v. Electronic Document Processing, Inc. (N.D. Cal.
2013) 966 F.Supp.2d 925, 935-937 [adopting Komarova holding that Rosenthal Act
claims are not barred by litigation privilege, and noting that since issuance of Komarova
“not ‘a single federal court has found Rosenthal Act claims to be barred by the litigation
privilege’”].)