DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

section 1871

Citation
section 1871
Parent Document
P. ex rel. etc. v. Hebb (2017)
Jurisdiction
California (state)
Effective Date
2017-12-19
Original Source
https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/4453096/p-ex-rel-etc-v-hebb/ ↗

Other Sections in This Document (759)

Full Text

685 chars 
10  “Each brief must: [¶] . . . [¶] State each point under a separate heading or
subheading summarizing the point, and support each point by argument and, if possible, by
citation of authority.” (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.204(a)(1)(B).) Issues not supported by
citation to legal authority are subject to forfeiture. (Needelman v. DeWolf Realty Co., Inc.
(2015) 239 Cal.App.4th 750, 762.) Because the issue of whether the litigation privilege
preempts the IFPA is a pure question of law, and because Alzayat cited Action Apartment
(discussed post) in his opposition to Sunline’s motion in the trial court, we exercise our
discretion to address it despite Alzayat’s noncomplying brief.