Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Section 1805

Citation
Section 1805
Parent Document
Sterling v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 168 Cal. App. 3d 176 (1985)
Jurisdiction
California (state)
Effective Date
1985-05-15

Other Sections in This Document (94)

Full Text

874 chars
It is clear that each factor enumerated in section 1805(e) is directly relevant to the increased or decreased comparative rate of return on the landlord's investment as affected by his costs or benefits. Since references to "substantial deterioration" of the unit and to "violations of housing, health *185 and safety codes" provide indicia relating to the comparative return on investment and that is one of the primary purposes of the power to decrease rents, there is no impermissible attempt to "enforce" habitability warranties or housing, health and safety codes. Indeed, no enforcement is sought. The landlord has a choice — he may elect to remedy the defects and seek the restoration of the higher rent or he may accept the downward adjustment in the maximum rent to be charged, leaving conditions unchanged, pending the involvement of one of the enforcing agencies.