Section 1805

Citation: Section 1805
Parent Document: Sterling v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 168 Cal. App. 3d 176 (1985)
Jurisdiction: California (state)
Effective Date: 1985-05-15
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2158620/sterling-v-santa-monica-rent-co... ↗

Other Sections in This Document (94)

Sterling v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 168 Cal. App. 3d 176 (1985)
Sterling v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 168 Cal. App. 3d 176 (1985)
Sterling v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 168 Cal. App. 3d 176 (1985)
Sterling v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 168 Cal. App. 3d 176 (1985)
Sterling v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 168 Cal. App. 3d 176 (1985)
Sterling v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 168 Cal. App. 3d 176 (1985)
Sterling v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 168 Cal. App. 3d 176 (1985)
Sterling v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 168 Cal. App. 3d 176 (1985)
Sterling v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 168 Cal. App. 3d 176 (1985)
Sterling v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 168 Cal. App. 3d 176 (1985)
Sterling v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 168 Cal. App. 3d 176 (1985)
Sterling v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 168 Cal. App. 3d 176 (1985)
Sterling v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 168 Cal. App. 3d 176 (1985)
Sterling v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 168 Cal. App. 3d 176 (1985)
Sterling v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 168 Cal. App. 3d 176 (1985)
Sterling v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 168 Cal. App. 3d 176 (1985)
Sterling v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 168 Cal. App. 3d 176 (1985)
Sterling v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 168 Cal. App. 3d 176 (1985)
Sterling v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 168 Cal. App. 3d 176 (1985)
Sterling v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 168 Cal. App. 3d 176 (1985)
Sterling v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 168 Cal. App. 3d 176 (1985)
Sterling v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 168 Cal. App. 3d 176 (1985)
Section 1805
Section 1805
Section 1805
Section 1805
Section 1805
Section 1805
Section 1805
Section 1805
Section 1805
Section 1805
Section 1805
Section 1805
Section 1805
Section 1805
Section 1805
Section 1805
Section 1805
Section 1805
Section 1805
Section 1805
Section 1805
Section 1805
Section 1805
Section 1805
Section 1805
Section 1805
Section 1805
Section 1805
Section 1805
Section 1805
Section 1805
Section 1805
Section 1805
Section 1805
Section 1805
Section 1805
Section 1805
Section 1805
Section 1805
Section 1805
Section 1805
Section 1805
Section 1805
Section 1805
Section 1805
Section 1805
Section 1805
Section 1805
Section 1805
Section 1805
Section 1805
Section 1805
Section 1805
Section 1805
Section 1805
Section 1805
Section 1805
Section 1805
Section 1805
Section 1805
Section 1805
Section 1805
Section 1805
Section 1805
Section 1805
Section 1805
Section 1805
Section 1805
Section 1805
Section 1805
Section 1805
Section 1805

Full Text

369 chars

HANSON (Thaxton), J.
We reluctantly concur. Under the standard of review applicable to police power regulations as set forth in cases such as Birkenfeld v. City of Berkeley (1976) 17 Cal.3d 129, 158-160 [130 Cal.Rptr. 465, 550 P.2d 1001], we are compelled to uphold the validity of the charter amendment in question since it is reasonably related to its stated purpose.