Section 1805
- Citation
- Section 1805
- Parent Document
- Sterling v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 168 Cal. App. 3d 176 (1985)
- Jurisdiction
- California (state)
- Effective Date
- 1985-05-15
Other Sections in This Document (94)
- Sterling v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 168 Cal. App. 3d 176 (1985)
- Sterling v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 168 Cal. App. 3d 176 (1985)
- Sterling v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 168 Cal. App. 3d 176 (1985)
- Sterling v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 168 Cal. App. 3d 176 (1985)
- Sterling v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 168 Cal. App. 3d 176 (1985)
- Sterling v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 168 Cal. App. 3d 176 (1985)
- Sterling v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 168 Cal. App. 3d 176 (1985)
- Sterling v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 168 Cal. App. 3d 176 (1985)
- Sterling v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 168 Cal. App. 3d 176 (1985)
- Sterling v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 168 Cal. App. 3d 176 (1985)
- Sterling v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 168 Cal. App. 3d 176 (1985)
- Sterling v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 168 Cal. App. 3d 176 (1985)
- Sterling v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 168 Cal. App. 3d 176 (1985)
- Sterling v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 168 Cal. App. 3d 176 (1985)
- Sterling v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 168 Cal. App. 3d 176 (1985)
- Sterling v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 168 Cal. App. 3d 176 (1985)
- Sterling v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 168 Cal. App. 3d 176 (1985)
- Sterling v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 168 Cal. App. 3d 176 (1985)
- Sterling v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 168 Cal. App. 3d 176 (1985)
- Sterling v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 168 Cal. App. 3d 176 (1985)
- Sterling v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 168 Cal. App. 3d 176 (1985)
- Sterling v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 168 Cal. App. 3d 176 (1985)
- Section 1805
- Section 1805
- Section 1805
- Section 1805
- Section 1805
- Section 1805
- Section 1805
- Section 1805
- Section 1805
- Section 1805
- Section 1805
- Section 1805
- Section 1805
- Section 1805
- Section 1805
- Section 1805
- Section 1805
- Section 1805
- Section 1805
- Section 1805
- Section 1805
- Section 1805
- Section 1805
- Section 1805
- Section 1805
- Section 1805
- Section 1805
- Section 1805
- Section 1805
- Section 1805
- Section 1805
- Section 1805
- Section 1805
- Section 1805
- Section 1805
- Section 1805
- Section 1805
- Section 1805
- Section 1805
- Section 1805
- Section 1805
- Section 1805
- Section 1805
- Section 1805
- Section 1805
- Section 1805
- Section 1805
- Section 1805
- Section 1805
- Section 1805
- Section 1805
- Section 1805
- Section 1805
- Section 1805
- Section 1805
- Section 1805
- Section 1805
- Section 1805
- Section 1805
- Section 1805
- Section 1805
- Section 1805
- Section 1805
- Section 1805
- Section 1805
- Section 1805
- Section 1805
- Section 1805
- Section 1805
- Section 1805
- Section 1805
- Section 1805
Full Text
620 charsHowever, insofar as the instant judgment purports only to prohibit the enforcement of rent decrease determinations in the underlying proceedings against petitioner until respondent's decision is final, we perceive no abuse of discretion. It is respondent who possesses the power to adjust rents; the hearing officer is merely the preliminary fact finder. Moreover, the delay between a hearing officer's decision and respondent's determination on appeal is brief; in the instant matter, the board rendered its decision in slightly more than 30 days. Hence, no great prejudice to real parties would result from a stay. III