Sterling v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 168 Cal. App. 3d 176 (1985)

Citation: Sterling v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 168 Cal. App. 3d 176 (1985)
Parent Document: Sterling v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 168 Cal. App. 3d 176 (1985)
Jurisdiction: California (state)
Effective Date: 1985-05-15
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2158620/sterling-v-santa-monica-rent-co... ↗

Other Sections in This Document (94)

Sterling v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 168 Cal. App. 3d 176 (1985)
Sterling v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 168 Cal. App. 3d 176 (1985)
Sterling v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 168 Cal. App. 3d 176 (1985)
Sterling v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 168 Cal. App. 3d 176 (1985)
Sterling v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 168 Cal. App. 3d 176 (1985)
Sterling v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 168 Cal. App. 3d 176 (1985)
Sterling v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 168 Cal. App. 3d 176 (1985)
Sterling v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 168 Cal. App. 3d 176 (1985)
Sterling v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 168 Cal. App. 3d 176 (1985)
Sterling v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 168 Cal. App. 3d 176 (1985)
Sterling v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 168 Cal. App. 3d 176 (1985)
Sterling v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 168 Cal. App. 3d 176 (1985)
Sterling v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 168 Cal. App. 3d 176 (1985)
Sterling v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 168 Cal. App. 3d 176 (1985)
Sterling v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 168 Cal. App. 3d 176 (1985)
Sterling v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 168 Cal. App. 3d 176 (1985)
Sterling v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 168 Cal. App. 3d 176 (1985)
Sterling v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 168 Cal. App. 3d 176 (1985)
Sterling v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 168 Cal. App. 3d 176 (1985)
Sterling v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 168 Cal. App. 3d 176 (1985)
Sterling v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 168 Cal. App. 3d 176 (1985)
Sterling v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 168 Cal. App. 3d 176 (1985)
Section 1805
Section 1805
Section 1805
Section 1805
Section 1805
Section 1805
Section 1805
Section 1805
Section 1805
Section 1805
Section 1805
Section 1805
Section 1805
Section 1805
Section 1805
Section 1805
Section 1805
Section 1805
Section 1805
Section 1805
Section 1805
Section 1805
Section 1805
Section 1805
Section 1805
Section 1805
Section 1805
Section 1805
Section 1805
Section 1805
Section 1805
Section 1805
Section 1805
Section 1805
Section 1805
Section 1805
Section 1805
Section 1805
Section 1805
Section 1805
Section 1805
Section 1805
Section 1805
Section 1805
Section 1805
Section 1805
Section 1805
Section 1805
Section 1805
Section 1805
Section 1805
Section 1805
Section 1805
Section 1805
Section 1805
Section 1805
Section 1805
Section 1805
Section 1805
Section 1805
Section 1805
Section 1805
Section 1805
Section 1805
Section 1805
Section 1805
Section 1805
Section 1805
Section 1805
Section 1805
Section 1805
Section 1805

Full Text

329 chars

Respondent contends the superior court erred in prohibiting respondent from utilizing all applicable criteria set forth in section 1805(e) as bases upon which to adjust maximum rents downward and in concluding state law preempts respondent’s authority to decrease maximum rents in certain cases. There is merit to the contention.