Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Section 1805

Citation
Section 1805
Parent Document
Sterling v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 168 Cal. App. 3d 176 (1985)
Jurisdiction
California (state)
Effective Date
1985-05-15

Other Sections in This Document (94)

Full Text

837 chars
Cotati Alliance for Better Housing v. City of Cotati (1983) 148 Cal. App.3d 280 [195 Cal. Rptr. 825] holds constitutionally valid guidelines virtually identical to those at issue in the instant case. The opinion notes the dual concerns of rental control, stating: "The purpose of rent control is to permit an efficient landlord to pay all actual and reasonable expenses and receive a fair profit while, at the same time, protecting the public interest in having affordable and properly maintained rental housing available to the citizens of the community." (Id., at p. 296; italics added.) Absent a power to decrease rents in the face of a substantial deterioration of the maintenance of a rental unit or a reduction in services, a rent control board lacks the tools with which to give full weight to the interests of the renting public.