Section 1437d
- Citation
- Section 1437d
- Parent Document
- Rucker v. Davis, 237 F.3d 1113 (2001)
- Jurisdiction
- United States (federal)
- Effective Date
- 2001-01-24
- Original Source
- https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/7086389/rucker-v-davis/ ↗
Other Sections in This Document (190)
- Rucker v. Davis, 237 F.3d 1113 (2001)
- Rucker v. Davis, 237 F.3d 1113 (2001)
- Rucker v. Davis, 237 F.3d 1113 (2001)
- Rucker v. Davis, 237 F.3d 1113 (2001)
- Rucker v. Davis, 237 F.3d 1113 (2001)
- Rucker v. Davis, 237 F.3d 1113 (2001)
- Rucker v. Davis, 237 F.3d 1113 (2001)
- Rucker v. Davis, 237 F.3d 1113 (2001)
- Rucker v. Davis, 237 F.3d 1113 (2001)
- Rucker v. Davis, 237 F.3d 1113 (2001)
- Rucker v. Davis, 237 F.3d 1113 (2001)
- Rucker v. Davis, 237 F.3d 1113 (2001)
- Rucker v. Davis, 237 F.3d 1113 (2001)
- Rucker v. Davis, 237 F.3d 1113 (2001)
- Rucker v. Davis, 237 F.3d 1113 (2001)
- Rucker v. Davis, 237 F.3d 1113 (2001)
- Rucker v. Davis, 237 F.3d 1113 (2001)
- Rucker v. Davis, 237 F.3d 1113 (2001)
- Rucker v. Davis, 237 F.3d 1113 (2001)
- Rucker v. Davis, 237 F.3d 1113 (2001)
- Rucker v. Davis, 237 F.3d 1113 (2001)
- Rucker v. Davis, 237 F.3d 1113 (2001)
- Rucker v. Davis, 237 F.3d 1113 (2001)
- Rucker v. Davis, 237 F.3d 1113 (2001)
- Rucker v. Davis, 237 F.3d 1113 (2001)
- Rucker v. Davis, 237 F.3d 1113 (2001)
- Rucker v. Davis, 237 F.3d 1113 (2001)
- Rucker v. Davis, 237 F.3d 1113 (2001)
- Rucker v. Davis, 237 F.3d 1113 (2001)
- Rucker v. Davis, 237 F.3d 1113 (2001)
- Rucker v. Davis, 237 F.3d 1113 (2001)
- Rucker v. Davis, 237 F.3d 1113 (2001)
- Rucker v. Davis, 237 F.3d 1113 (2001)
- Rucker v. Davis, 237 F.3d 1113 (2001)
- Rucker v. Davis, 237 F.3d 1113 (2001)
- Rucker v. Davis, 237 F.3d 1113 (2001)
- Rucker v. Davis, 237 F.3d 1113 (2001)
- Rucker v. Davis, 237 F.3d 1113 (2001)
- Rucker v. Davis, 237 F.3d 1113 (2001)
- Rucker v. Davis, 237 F.3d 1113 (2001)
- Rucker v. Davis, 237 F.3d 1113 (2001)
- Rucker v. Davis, 237 F.3d 1113 (2001)
- Rucker v. Davis, 237 F.3d 1113 (2001)
- Rucker v. Davis, 237 F.3d 1113 (2001)
- Rucker v. Davis, 237 F.3d 1113 (2001)
- Rucker v. Davis, 237 F.3d 1113 (2001)
- Rucker v. Davis, 237 F.3d 1113 (2001)
- Rucker v. Davis, 237 F.3d 1113 (2001)
- Section 1437d
- Section 1437d
- Section 1437d
- Section 1437d
- Section 1437d
- Section 1437d
- Section 1437d
- Section 1437d
- Section 1437d
- Section 1437d
- Section 1437d
- Section 1437d
- Section 1437d
- Section 1437d
- Section 1437d
- Section 1437d
- Section 1437d
- Section 1437d
- Section 1437d
- Section 1437d
- Section 1437d
- Section 1437d
- Section 1437d
- Section 1437d
- Section 1437d
- Section 1437d
- Section 1437d
- Section 1437d
- Section 1437d
- Section 1437d
- Section 1437d
- Section 1437d
- Section 1437d
- Section 1437d
- Section 1437d
- Section 1437d
- Section 1437d
- Section 1437d
- Section 1437d
- Section 1437d
- Section 1437d
- Section 1437d
- Section 1437d
- Section 1437d
- Section 1437d
- Section 1437d
- Section 1437d
- Section 1437d
- Section 1437d
- Section 1437d
- Section 1437d
- Section 1437d
- Section 1437d
- Section 1437d
- Section 1437d
- Section 1437d
- Section 1437d
- Section 1437d
- Section 1437d
- Section 1437d
- Section 1437d
- Section 1437d
- Section 1437d
- Section 1437d
- Section 1437d
- Section 1437d
- Section 1437d
- Section 1437d
- Section 1437d
- Section 1437d
- Section 1437d
- Section 1437d
- Section 1437d
- Section 1437d
- Section 1437d
- Section 1437d
- Section 1437d
- Section 1437d
- Section 1437d
- Section 1437d
- Section 1437d
- Section 1437d
- Section 1437d
- Section 1437d
- Section 1437d
- Section 1437d
- Section 1437d
- Section 1437d
- Section 1437d
- Section 1437d
- Section 1437d
- Section 1437d
- Section 1437d
- Section 1437d
- Section 1437d
- Section 1437d
- Section 1437d
- Section 1437d
- Section 1437d
- Section 1437d
- Section 1437d
- Section 1437d
- Section 1437d
- Section 1437d
- Section 1437d
- Section 1437d
- Section 1437d
- Section 1437d
- Section 1437d
- Section 1437d
- Section 1437d
- Section 1437d
- Section 1437d
- Section 1437d
- Section 1437d
- Section 1437d
- Section 1437d
- Section 1437d
- Section 1437d
- Section 1437d
- Section 1437d
- Section 1437d
- Section 1437d
- Section 1437d
- Section 1437d
- Section 1437d
- Section 1437d
- Section 1437d
- Section 1437d
- Section 1437d
- Section 1437d
- Section 1437d
- Section 1437d
- Section 1437d
- Section 1437d
- Section 1437d
- Section 1437d
- Section 1437d
- Section 1437d
- Section 1437d
- Section 1437d
- Section 1437d
Full Text
531 charsWith respect to the portion of the injunction which enjoins OHA from pursuing its unlawful detainer actions against Lee and Hill, the facts of the underlying cases come into play. OHA, however, has not contested the assertions of Lee and Hill that they did not know or have reason to know of their grandsons’ drug use. Assuming these facts are true, Lee and Hill qualify as innocent tenants. On the facts before it, the district court did not abuse its discretion by enjoining their unlawful detainer actions. B. Walker’s ADA Claim