Section 1437d

Citation: Section 1437d
Parent Document: Rucker v. Davis, 237 F.3d 1113 (2001)
Jurisdiction: United States (federal)
Effective Date: 2001-01-24
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/7086389/rucker-v-davis/ ↗

Other Sections in This Document (190)

Rucker v. Davis, 237 F.3d 1113 (2001)
Rucker v. Davis, 237 F.3d 1113 (2001)
Rucker v. Davis, 237 F.3d 1113 (2001)
Rucker v. Davis, 237 F.3d 1113 (2001)
Rucker v. Davis, 237 F.3d 1113 (2001)
Rucker v. Davis, 237 F.3d 1113 (2001)
Rucker v. Davis, 237 F.3d 1113 (2001)
Rucker v. Davis, 237 F.3d 1113 (2001)
Rucker v. Davis, 237 F.3d 1113 (2001)
Rucker v. Davis, 237 F.3d 1113 (2001)
Rucker v. Davis, 237 F.3d 1113 (2001)
Rucker v. Davis, 237 F.3d 1113 (2001)
Rucker v. Davis, 237 F.3d 1113 (2001)
Rucker v. Davis, 237 F.3d 1113 (2001)
Rucker v. Davis, 237 F.3d 1113 (2001)
Rucker v. Davis, 237 F.3d 1113 (2001)
Rucker v. Davis, 237 F.3d 1113 (2001)
Rucker v. Davis, 237 F.3d 1113 (2001)
Rucker v. Davis, 237 F.3d 1113 (2001)
Rucker v. Davis, 237 F.3d 1113 (2001)
Rucker v. Davis, 237 F.3d 1113 (2001)
Rucker v. Davis, 237 F.3d 1113 (2001)
Rucker v. Davis, 237 F.3d 1113 (2001)
Rucker v. Davis, 237 F.3d 1113 (2001)
Rucker v. Davis, 237 F.3d 1113 (2001)
Rucker v. Davis, 237 F.3d 1113 (2001)
Rucker v. Davis, 237 F.3d 1113 (2001)
Rucker v. Davis, 237 F.3d 1113 (2001)
Rucker v. Davis, 237 F.3d 1113 (2001)
Rucker v. Davis, 237 F.3d 1113 (2001)
Rucker v. Davis, 237 F.3d 1113 (2001)
Rucker v. Davis, 237 F.3d 1113 (2001)
Rucker v. Davis, 237 F.3d 1113 (2001)
Rucker v. Davis, 237 F.3d 1113 (2001)
Rucker v. Davis, 237 F.3d 1113 (2001)
Rucker v. Davis, 237 F.3d 1113 (2001)
Rucker v. Davis, 237 F.3d 1113 (2001)
Rucker v. Davis, 237 F.3d 1113 (2001)
Rucker v. Davis, 237 F.3d 1113 (2001)
Rucker v. Davis, 237 F.3d 1113 (2001)
Rucker v. Davis, 237 F.3d 1113 (2001)
Rucker v. Davis, 237 F.3d 1113 (2001)
Rucker v. Davis, 237 F.3d 1113 (2001)
Rucker v. Davis, 237 F.3d 1113 (2001)
Rucker v. Davis, 237 F.3d 1113 (2001)
Rucker v. Davis, 237 F.3d 1113 (2001)
Rucker v. Davis, 237 F.3d 1113 (2001)
Rucker v. Davis, 237 F.3d 1113 (2001)
Section 1437d
Section 1437d
Section 1437d
Section 1437d
Section 1437d
Section 1437d
Section 1437d
Section 1437d
Section 1437d
Section 1437d
Section 1437d
Section 1437d
Section 1437d
Section 1437d
Section 1437d
Section 1437d
Section 1437d
Section 1437d
Section 1437d
Section 1437d
Section 1437d
Section 1437d
Section 1437d
Section 1437d
Section 1437d
Section 1437d
Section 1437d
Section 1437d
Section 1437d
Section 1437d
Section 1437d
Section 1437d
Section 1437d
Section 1437d
Section 1437d
Section 1437d
Section 1437d
Section 1437d
Section 1437d
Section 1437d
Section 1437d
Section 1437d
Section 1437d
Section 1437d
Section 1437d
Section 1437d
Section 1437d
Section 1437d
Section 1437d
Section 1437d
Section 1437d
Section 1437d
Section 1437d
Section 1437d
Section 1437d
Section 1437d
Section 1437d
Section 1437d
Section 1437d
Section 1437d
Section 1437d
Section 1437d
Section 1437d
Section 1437d
Section 1437d
Section 1437d
Section 1437d
Section 1437d
Section 1437d
Section 1437d
Section 1437d
Section 1437d
Section 1437d
Section 1437d
Section 1437d
Section 1437d
Section 1437d
Section 1437d
Section 1437d
Section 1437d
Section 1437d
Section 1437d
Section 1437d
Section 1437d
Section 1437d
Section 1437d
Section 1437d
Section 1437d
Section 1437d
Section 1437d
Section 1437d
Section 1437d
Section 1437d
Section 1437d
Section 1437d
Section 1437d
Section 1437d
Section 1437d
Section 1437d
Section 1437d
Section 1437d
Section 1437d
Section 1437d
Section 1437d
Section 1437d
Section 1437d
Section 1437d
Section 1437d
Section 1437d
Section 1437d
Section 1437d
Section 1437d
Section 1437d
Section 1437d
Section 1437d
Section 1437d
Section 1437d
Section 1437d
Section 1437d
Section 1437d
Section 1437d
Section 1437d
Section 1437d
Section 1437d
Section 1437d
Section 1437d
Section 1437d
Section 1437d
Section 1437d
Section 1437d
Section 1437d
Section 1437d
Section 1437d
Section 1437d
Section 1437d
Section 1437d
Section 1437d
Section 1437d
Section 1437d
Section 1437d
Section 1437d
Section 1437d

Full Text

526 chars

Reviewing the interpretation of § 1437d(i )(6) de novo, we have concluded that HUD’s interpretation is inconsistent with Congressional intent and must be rejected. Chevron, 467 U.S. at 842-43, 104 S.Ct. 2778. The question remains whether the district court properly enjoined OHA from evicting innocent tenants pursuant to paragraph 9(m) of the OHA lease. This provision was required by HUD regulations (24 C.F.R. § 966.4(f)(12)(i)), which were, as discussed above, premised on HUD’s erroneous interpretation of § 1437d(i )(6).