Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

A Society Without a Name v. Commonwealth of Virginia, 655 F.3d 342 (2011)

Citation
A Society Without a Name v. Commonwealth of Virginia, 655 F.3d 342 (2011)
Parent Document
A Society Without a Name v. Commonwealth of Virginia, 655 F.3d 342 (2011)
Effective Date
2011-08-24

Other Sections in This Document (158)

Full Text

518 chars
In sum, I conclude that ASWAN has plausibly alleged con-
tinuing violations of the FHA against the City of Richmond,
VCU, and Homeward. In my view, ASWAN also makes out
           A SOCIETY WITHOUT A NAME v. VIRGINIA            27
continuing ADA violations against the City of Richmond and
VCU. I would also permit the equal protection and § 1983
claims against the City of Richmond to proceed under the
continuing violation doctrine. To the extent that the majority
opinion holds differently, I respectfully dissent.