A Society Without a Name v. Commonwealth of Virginia, 655 F.3d 342 (2011)

Citation: A Society Without a Name v. Commonwealth of Virginia, 655 F.3d 342 (2011)
Parent Document: A Society Without a Name v. Commonwealth of Virginia, 655 F.3d 342 (2011)
Jurisdiction: United States (federal)
Effective Date: 2011-08-24
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/612506/a-society-without-a-name-v-commo... ↗

Full Text

900 chars

Nat’l Adver. Co. v. City of Raleigh, 947 F.2d 1158, 1167 (4th
Cir. 1991). The limit to this rule is that subsequent effects
from an earlier discriminatory act do not begin the limitations
period anew; rather, "[t]he challenged action must be repeated
within the statute of limitations period." Id.; see also Jersey
Heights Neighborhood Ass’n v. Glendening, 174 F.3d 180,
189 (4th Cir. 1999) (where location of highway was alleged
discriminatory act, post-construction refusals to reconsider
location or to mitigate impact of highway on neighborhood
were mere effects of original alleged violation); Moseke v.
Miller & Smith, Inc., 202 F. Supp. 2d 492, 507-08 (E.D. Va.
2002) (where plaintiffs alleged that condominiums did not
comply with FHA, continued existence of noncompliant fea-
24          A SOCIETY WITHOUT A NAME v. VIRGINIA
tures were mere effects of original noncompliant construc-
tion).

Other Sections in This Document (158)

Full Text