A Society Without a Name v. Commonwealth of Virginia, 655 F.3d 342 (2011)

Citation: A Society Without a Name v. Commonwealth of Virginia, 655 F.3d 342 (2011)
Parent Document: A Society Without a Name v. Commonwealth of Virginia, 655 F.3d 342 (2011)
Jurisdiction: United States (federal)
Effective Date: 2011-08-24
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/612506/a-society-without-a-name-v-commo... ↗

Full Text

590 chars

Perhaps recognizing that its fallback argument lacks any
doctrinal support, VCU principally argues that ASWAN’s
retaliation claim fails because ASWAN assertedly had no
"reasonable, good faith belief" that the ADA had been vio-
lated. Freilich v. Upper Chesapeake Health, Inc., 313 F.3d
205, 216 (4th Cir. 2002). Specifically, VCU contends that
ASWAN could not have reasonably believed that "[1] a hill
is a ‘barrier’ under the ADA; [2] filing this suit years later
could prevail; [3] a donor of land can be treated like a segre-
gating zoning authority; or [4] segregating someone from ‘the

Other Sections in This Document (158)

Full Text