A Society Without a Name v. Commonwealth of Virginia, 655 F.3d 342 (2011)

Citation: A Society Without a Name v. Commonwealth of Virginia, 655 F.3d 342 (2011)
Parent Document: A Society Without a Name v. Commonwealth of Virginia, 655 F.3d 342 (2011)
Jurisdiction: United States (federal)
Effective Date: 2011-08-24
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/612506/a-society-without-a-name-v-commo... ↗

Full Text

1,078 chars

There are two problems with ASWAN’s argument. One is
that the time gap between the opening of the Conrad Center
and the actions complained of is not material because
ASWAN knew or should have known that intake services
were going to be shifted there from the very conception of the
Center. In other words, the relocation of intake services is
simply another continuing effect of the original decision to
locate the Conrad Center on Oliver Hill Way. Indeed,
ASWAN admits as much by arguing in its own brief that if
the defendants had not conspired to establish the Conrad Cen-
ter on Oliver Hill Way, then "there would have been no Con-
rad Center on Oliver Hill Way to receive relocation of the
[intake services] and the City’s processing of applications for
access to overflow shelter downtown on very cold nights."
12          A SOCIETY WITHOUT A NAME v. VIRGINIA
   The other problem with ASWAN’s argument is that the
intake services to sign up for overnight shelter do not consti-
tute "services" within the meaning of the FHA. As explained
by this court in Jersey Heights:

Other Sections in This Document (158)

Full Text