Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

A Society Without a Name v. Commonwealth of Virginia, 655 F.3d 342 (2011)

Citation
A Society Without a Name v. Commonwealth of Virginia, 655 F.3d 342 (2011)
Parent Document
A Society Without a Name v. Commonwealth of Virginia, 655 F.3d 342 (2011)
Effective Date
2011-08-24

Other Sections in This Document (158)

Full Text

752 chars
"To survive a motion to dismiss, a complaint must contain
sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, ‘to state a claim to
relief that is plausible on its face.’" Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 129 S.
Ct. 1937, 1949 (2009) (quoting Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twom-
bly, 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007)). A court decides whether this
standard is met by separating the legal conclusions from the
factual allegations, assuming the truth of only the factual alle-
gations, and then determining whether those allegations allow
the court to reasonably infer that "the defendant is liable for
the misconduct alleged." Id. at 1949-50. In other words, the
factual allegations (taken as true) must "permit the court to
infer more than the mere possibility of misconduct." Id. at
1950.