Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

section 1983

Citation
section 1983
Parent Document
Gonzalez v. Lee County Housing Authority, 161 F.3d 1290 (1998)
Effective Date
1998-12-02

Other Sections in This Document (884)

Full Text

1,751 chars
34
  See Lussier v. Dugger, 904 F.2d 661, 663-64, 670 n.10 (11th Cir. 1990)
(the Rehabilitation Act of 1973); see also Cullinan v. Abramson, 128 F.3d
301, 307-12 (6th Cir. 1997) (the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt
Organizations Act), cert. denied, __ U.S. __, 118 S. Ct. 1560 (1998);
Torcasio v. Murray, 57 F.3d 1340, 1343 (4th Cir. 1995) (the Americans
with Disabilities Act and the Rehabilitation Act of 1973); Lue v. Moore,
43 F.3d 1203, 1205 (8th Cir. 1994) (the Rehabilitation Act of 1973);
McGregor v. Louisiana State Univ. Bd. of Supervisors, 3 F.3d 850, 862 &
n.19 (5th Cir. 1993) (the Rehabiliation Act of 1973); Cronen v. Texas
Dep’t of Human Servs., 977 F.2d 934, 939-40 (5th Cir. 1992) (Food Stamp
Act of 1977); Doe v. Attorney General of the United States, 941 F.2d 780,
797-99 (9th Cir. 1991) (the Rehabilitation Act of 1973); Christopher P.
by Norma P. v. Marcus, 915 F.2d 794, 798-801 (2d Cir. 1990) (the
Education for All Handicapped Children Act of 1975); P.C. v. McLaughlin,
913 F.2d 1033, 1040-42 (2d Cir. 1990) (the Education for All Handicapped
Children Act of 1975 and the Rehabilitation Act of 1973); Affiliated
Capital Corp. v. City of Houston, 735 F.2d 1555, 1569-70 (5th Cir. 1984)
(the Sherman Antitrust Act); National Black Police Ass’n v. Velde, 712
F.2d 569, 574-80 (D.C. Cir. 1983) (Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of
1964 and the Crime Control Act of 1973). But see Samuel v. Holmes, 138
F.3d 173, 178 (5th Cir. 1998) (holding that qualified immunity is not an
available defense in retaliation claims brought under the False Claims
Act). We stress, however, that our opinion in this case should not be
construed to address whether qualified immunity is available in actions
brought under statutes other than § 3617.