Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Gonzalez v. Lee County Housing Authority, 161 F.3d 1290 (1998)

Citation
Gonzalez v. Lee County Housing Authority, 161 F.3d 1290 (1998)
Parent Document
Gonzalez v. Lee County Housing Authority, 161 F.3d 1290 (1998)
Effective Date
1998-12-02

Other Sections in This Document (884)

Full Text

952 chars
It is unclear whether this portion of the letter can “be fairly characterized as constituting speech on a matter of public concern----” Connick, 461 U.S. at 146, 103 S.Ct. at 1690. On the one hand, a public official’s authorization of discriminatory rental practices unquestionably is an important matter of general public interest. See, e.g., 42 U.S.C. § 3601 (“It is the policy of the United States to provide ... for fair housing throughout the United States.”); cf. Con-nick, 461 U.S. at 149, 103 S.Ct. at 1691 (holding that the pressuring of public employees to work in political campaigns is a matter of public concern). Moreover, a public employee’s statement may satisfy the public concern requirement even where, as here, the employee speaks within the workplace, after an adverse employment decision, about a specific matter that had not drawn significant public attention prior to her speech. See Connick, 461 U.S. at 149, 103 S.Ct. at 1691.