Southwest Fair Housing Council v. Mdwid, 17 F.4th 950 (2021)

Citation: Southwest Fair Housing Council v. Mdwid, 17 F.4th 950 (2021)
Parent Document: Southwest Fair Housing Council v. Mdwid, 17 F.4th 950 (2021)
Jurisdiction: United States (federal)
Effective Date: 2021-11-12
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/5296996/southwest-fair-housing-council-v-mdwid/ ↗

Full Text

693 chars

Now, had the District set the security deposit at clearly
excessive amounts relative to predictable monthly water
bills for individual units (say, $500 or $1000), or had the
District failed to proffer evidence that its security deposit
amount was keyed to the size of the largest delinquency
(with accompanying documentary support), or had the
District decided not to make the security deposit refundable
to public housing tenants who did not leave behind
delinquent accounts, then Appellants might have raised a
triable issue as to whether the policy served the legitimate
goal of preventing financial loss to the District from
delinquencies. But Appellants did not provide any such
evidence.

Other Sections in This Document (145)

Full Text