Southwest Fair Housing Council v. Mdwid, 17 F.4th 950 (2021)

Citation: Southwest Fair Housing Council v. Mdwid, 17 F.4th 950 (2021)
Parent Document: Southwest Fair Housing Council v. Mdwid, 17 F.4th 950 (2021)
Jurisdiction: United States (federal)
Effective Date: 2021-11-12
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/5296996/southwest-fair-housing-council-v-mdwid/ ↗

Full Text

1,034 chars

I looked—my rationale was the fact that we
         need to be able to cover the delinquent
         accounts and protect the District from having
         to pay—provide water at no cost to those
         accounts. And I—if I remember correctly, it
    16
       As the District notes, Appellants incorrectly point to the District’s
“net assets” in arguing the size of the delinquencies are inconsequential.
But they do not explain how the value of a company’s assets (e.g.,
underground water pipes, pumps, vehicles, office equipment, easements,
etc.) is relevant to whether unpaid accounts receivable impact a
business’s daily operation or financial commitments. Appellants did not
offer evidence on the District’s cash flow. But even were the cash flow
positive, that would not delegitimatize the District’s interest in seeking
to have its water bills paid.
     17
        Appellants fail to cite to any record evidence that proves this 2011
delinquency statement is inaccurate.
    SW. FAIR HOUSING V. MARICOPA DOMESTIC WATER 33

Other Sections in This Document (145)

Full Text