Southwest Fair Housing Council v. Mdwid, 17 F.4th 950 (2021)

Citation: Southwest Fair Housing Council v. Mdwid, 17 F.4th 950 (2021)
Parent Document: Southwest Fair Housing Council v. Mdwid, 17 F.4th 950 (2021)
Jurisdiction: United States (federal)
Effective Date: 2021-11-12
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/5296996/southwest-fair-housing-council-v-mdwid/ ↗

Full Text

809 chars

2
      Appellants also named Pinal County as a defendant and alleged
civil rights claims under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 & 1986. However,
Appellants and Pinal County reached a settlement.
     3
       In Appellants’ first amended complaint, they allege that the District
also created two other policies applicable only to Edwards Circle
residents: a Late Payment Policy and a No Outstanding Balance Policy.
In addition to a 1.5% late payment fee applicable to all customers, the
Late Payment Policy allegedly applied to make Pinal County tenants’
security deposits refundable only at the discretion of the District if a
tenant had provided late payments four times within one year. The No
Outstanding Balance Policy allegedly required Pinal County tenants to
pay off balances owed to the District by a prior tenant.

Other Sections in This Document (145)

Full Text