Southwest Fair Housing Council v. Mdwid, 17 F.4th 950 (2021)

Citation: Southwest Fair Housing Council v. Mdwid, 17 F.4th 950 (2021)
Parent Document: Southwest Fair Housing Council v. Mdwid, 17 F.4th 950 (2021)
Jurisdiction: United States (federal)
Effective Date: 2021-11-12
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/5296996/southwest-fair-housing-council-v-mdwid/ ↗

Full Text

896 chars

that these policies will not be enforced against any Edwards Circle
resident in the future. The only remedy Appellants seek as to these
policies is to enjoin their further enforcement against Edwards Circle
residents. “Article III requires that a live controversy persist throughout
all stages of the litigation.” Gator.com Corp. v. L.L. Bean, Inc., 398 F.3d
1125, 1128–29 (9th Cir. 2006) (en banc). Because it now appears that
no controversy exists as to these two policies, we DISMISS the portion
of Appellants’ appeal that challenges the Late Payment Policy and No
Outstanding Balance Policy claims. The remainder of our analysis
continues to rely on the District’s representation that the security
deposits paid by Edwards Circle residents are non-discretionarily
refundable as long as a customer does not leave behind a delinquent
balance.
    SW. FAIR HOUSING V. MARICOPA DOMESTIC WATER 13

Other Sections in This Document (145)

Full Text