Southwest Fair Housing Council v. Mdwid, 17 F.4th 950 (2021)

Citation: Southwest Fair Housing Council v. Mdwid, 17 F.4th 950 (2021)
Parent Document: Southwest Fair Housing Council v. Mdwid, 17 F.4th 950 (2021)
Jurisdiction: United States (federal)
Effective Date: 2021-11-12
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/5296996/southwest-fair-housing-council-v-mdwid/ ↗

Full Text

831 chars

Neither is there a triable issue as to whether the District’s
decision to increase the security deposit to $180, rather than
a smaller amount, serves in a significant way the District’s
legitimate interest in guaranteeing that it will receive full
payment for services rendered. The record includes
delinquent account balances left by Edwards Circle residents
at various times between 2010 and 2015. At the time the
policy was first announced (November 2014), the District
had multiple delinquent Edwards Circle accounts still on the
books, including one delinquent account from 2011 that
amounted to $184.45. 17 The District’s designated Rule
30(b)(6) representative witness expressly testified at
deposition that the District chose a dollar figure that would
cover the largest outstanding accounts to prevent loss to the
company:

Other Sections in This Document (145)

Full Text