Southwest Fair Housing Council v. Mdwid, 17 F.4th 950 (2021)

Citation: Southwest Fair Housing Council v. Mdwid, 17 F.4th 950 (2021)
Parent Document: Southwest Fair Housing Council v. Mdwid, 17 F.4th 950 (2021)
Jurisdiction: United States (federal)
Effective Date: 2021-11-12
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/5296996/southwest-fair-housing-council-v-mdwid/ ↗

Full Text

633 chars

Here, because the District explicitly applied the adverse
effects of the policy—increasing the security deposit to
$180—only to a subset of its customer base, the causation
analysis is not all that complicated. The adverse impact
complained about by Appellants derives wholly from the
innerworkings of the policy. For no reason other than the
District’s decision to create two different security deposit
amounts for its public housing customers and for its private
housing customers did the disparate impact arise. After the
implementation of the policy and as a direct result of it, a
26 SW. FAIR HOUSING V. MARICOPA DOMESTIC WATER

Other Sections in This Document (145)

Full Text