Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Robin Farms, Inc. v. Bartholome, 989 S.W.2d 238 (1999)

Citation
Robin Farms, Inc. v. Bartholome, 989 S.W.2d 238 (1999)
Parent Document
Robin Farms, Inc. v. Bartholome, 989 S.W.2d 238 (1999)
Jurisdiction
Missouri (state)
Effective Date
1999-04-06

Other Sections in This Document (172)

Full Text

520 chars
413 S.W.2d 592, 601 (Mo.App.1967). Thus, by assigning the lease to Robin Farms, without having done so, Harlow Fay was in default of the lease. As a result, as to Harlow Fay, the respondents were entitled to possession of the farm. As to Robin Farms, the respondents were also entitled to possession of the farm because the alleged assignment to it by Harlow Fay of the lease was void and did not create any tenancy. See Hemisphere Tour & Travel, S., Inc. v. B.T. Bones, 978 S.W.2d 451, 454 (Mo.App.1998); Conley v. Dee,