Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Robin Farms, Inc. v. Bartholome, 989 S.W.2d 238 (1999)

Citation
Robin Farms, Inc. v. Bartholome, 989 S.W.2d 238 (1999)
Parent Document
Robin Farms, Inc. v. Bartholome, 989 S.W.2d 238 (1999)
Jurisdiction
Missouri (state)
Effective Date
1999-04-06

Other Sections in This Document (172)

Full Text

828 chars
On August 18, 1997, the appellants filed a motion to amend their petition for a third time, seeking to amend their Count I to a breach of contract claim, which motion was denied by the court. John Fay and Robin Farms also filed a “Motion For Recusal of Honorable Gary E. Ravens,” alleging that on August 10, 1997, they learned that Judge Ravens, while in private practice, had represented respondent Mary Bartholome, resulting in a conflict of interest requiring his recusal, pursuant to Rule 2, Canons 1, 2, and 3 D of the Code of Judicial Conduct. The court denied the motion on August 20, 1997. On August 18, 1997, John Fay and Robin Farms filed a second motion for continuance, again alleging that John Fay could not attend the scheduled trial date due to his military service. The court denied the motion on August 20,1997.