Robin Farms, Inc. v. Bartholome, 989 S.W.2d 238 (1999)

Citation: Robin Farms, Inc. v. Bartholome, 989 S.W.2d 238 (1999)
Parent Document: Robin Farms, Inc. v. Bartholome, 989 S.W.2d 238 (1999)
Jurisdiction: Missouri (state)
Effective Date: 1999-04-06
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2453209/robin-farms-inc-v-bartholome/ ↗

Full Text

1,028 chars

On December 19, the motion was heard. John Fay and Robin Farms did not produce K.R. Meier or present any evidence, choosing to stand on the purported order to report for duty and John Fay’s affidavit. The court denied the motion for continuance and proceeded to trial. At trial, the court took up Counts I and II of the appellants’ petition and found in favor of the respondents on these counts because the appellants refused to present any evidence in support thereof. Thereafter, the respondents asked the court to take up and consider their counterclaim for ejectment as to Steven and Linda Fay, who, at that time, were still living in the house on the farm, and the court entered judgment in favor of the respondents on their counterclaim as to Steven and Linda Fay. .The respondents next sought leave to file a fourth motion for sanctions against the appellants, and the court gave them until January 15, 1998, to file their motion. On February 2,1998, the court entered a written judgment as to its December 19 th rulings.

Other Sections in This Document (172)

Full Text