Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Robin Farms, Inc. v. Bartholome, 989 S.W.2d 238 (1999)

Citation
Robin Farms, Inc. v. Bartholome, 989 S.W.2d 238 (1999)
Parent Document
Robin Farms, Inc. v. Bartholome, 989 S.W.2d 238 (1999)
Jurisdiction
Missouri (state)
Effective Date
1999-04-06

Other Sections in This Document (172)

Full Text

385 chars
Rule 2, Canon 3 D(l)(b), (d). When these types of relationships exist, in spite of the fact that a judge might assert that he or she could still be fair and impartial, the Code compels recusal because common sense and logic tell us that the appearance of impropriety is such that a reasonable person would never believe in the judge’s impartiality, regardless of his or her assurances.