Vermett v. State, 544 S.W.3d 294 (2018)

Citation: Vermett v. State, 544 S.W.3d 294 (2018)
Parent Document: Vermett v. State, 544 S.W.3d 294 (2018)
Jurisdiction: Missouri (state)
Effective Date: 2018-02-27
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/6241359/vermett-v-state/ ↗

Full Text

867 chars

Without any reply from Appellants concerning the ramp, Respondents returned to Villa Roma on February 16, 2010, when they completed and signed a lease application, paid a $25 application fee, and paid a $100 security deposit. Respondents believed the security deposit was for Unit 1915C-the ground-floor unit where Ms. Vermett had led them six days earlier and indicated that the apartment would be available in April 2010. Respondents claimed that after they had paid the application fee and security deposit, Ms. Vermett informed Respondents that it would not be possible to build the ramp for Building 1915, which obviously made it impractical for Respondents to rent Unit 1915C. Ms. Vermett's statements about not *298building the ramp led to a heated exchange between Ms. Vermett and Respondents that left both Respondents feeling shocked, angry, and humiliated.

Other Sections in This Document (39)

Full Text