Vermett v. State, 544 S.W.3d 294 (2018)

Citation: Vermett v. State, 544 S.W.3d 294 (2018)
Parent Document: Vermett v. State, 544 S.W.3d 294 (2018)
Jurisdiction: Missouri (state)
Effective Date: 2018-02-27
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/6241359/vermett-v-state/ ↗

Full Text

863 chars

Appellants offer two points on appeal. In Appellants' first point, they argue that the MCHR's decision and order was not supported by competent and substantial evidence upon the whole record. Specifically, Appellants contend that they did not violate § 213.040(1) because they did not refuse *297to rent or negotiate a rental agreement with Respondents and that Mrs. Henderson's disability was not a contributing factor in their decision. In Appellants' second point, they assert that the MCHR's determination of damages was also not supported by competent and substantial evidence upon the whole record, as the MCHR's calculations of actual damages were incorrect and Appellants' attempts to accommodate Respondents should have been given more weight in the assessment of damages. We affirm the judgment of the circuit court. I. Factual and Procedural Background

Other Sections in This Document (39)

Full Text