Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Citation
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Parent Document
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Jurisdiction
- DC (municipal)
- Effective Date
- 2005-09-08
- Original Source
- https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2081609/childs-v-purll/ ↗
Other Sections in This Document (121)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- § 400
- § 400
- § 400
- § 400
- § 400
- § 400
- § 400
- § 400
- § 400
- § 400
- § 400
- § 400
- § 400
- § 17
- § 17
- § 17
- § 17
- § 17
- § 17
- § 17
- § 17
- § 17
- § 17
- § 17
- § 17
- § 17
- § 17
Full Text
406 charsAppellants may be able to prove that their tenancy at 1411 Ridge Place was in violation of § 707.3, as it is undisputed that the landlord and its management company were notified in the lease agreements that Tiffany Childs and Robbie Davis were under eight years of age, and the defendants have made no showing that the dwelling they leased to appellants was lead-free within the meaning of the regulation.