Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Citation
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Parent Document
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Jurisdiction
- DC (municipal)
- Effective Date
- 2005-09-08
- Original Source
- https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2081609/childs-v-purll/ ↗
Other Sections in This Document (121)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
- § 400
- § 400
- § 400
- § 400
- § 400
- § 400
- § 400
- § 400
- § 400
- § 400
- § 400
- § 400
- § 400
- § 17
- § 17
- § 17
- § 17
- § 17
- § 17
- § 17
- § 17
- § 17
- § 17
- § 17
- § 17
- § 17
- § 17
Full Text
175 charsThis evidence undisputedly illustrates that neither the Purll nor Wil-loughby defendants had notice of any lead hazard, and therefore, did not and could not breach their duty.