Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)

Citation: Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
Parent Document: Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
Jurisdiction: DC (municipal)
Effective Date: 2005-09-08
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2081609/childs-v-purll/ ↗

Other Sections in This Document (121)

Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
Childs v. Purll, 882 A.2d 227 (2005)
§ 400
§ 400
§ 400
§ 400
§ 400
§ 400
§ 400
§ 400
§ 400
§ 400
§ 400
§ 400
§ 400
§ 17
§ 17
§ 17
§ 17
§ 17
§ 17
§ 17
§ 17
§ 17
§ 17
§ 17
§ 17
§ 17
§ 17

Full Text

283 chars

A.2d at 794. Although the defendants did not deny the presence of lead paint on the walls of appellants’ apartment, the court found it undisputed that none of the defendants was aware of any lead paint hazard there. The court accurately summarized the undisputed evidence as follows;