Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Martini v. Post, 178 Wash. App. 153 (2013)

Citation
Martini v. Post, 178 Wash. App. 153 (2013)
Parent Document
Martini v. Post, 178 Wash. App. 153 (2013)
Jurisdiction
Washington (state)
Effective Date
2013-11-26

Other Sections in This Document (58)

Full Text

497 chars
¶41 The instant case is distinguishable from Pruitt and Sjogren. First, Martini has no other theory of landlord liability under which to assert his negligence claim against Post as the plaintiff in Sjogren had with Restatement (Second) of Torts § 343A. Second, Martini, Abson, and Abson’s children were all tenants of the home, whereas the plaintiffs in both Pruitt and Sjogren were guests of the tenant. Thus the plaintiffs here, as tenants, have a direct legal relationship with their landlord.6