Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Martini v. Post, 178 Wash. App. 153 (2013)

Citation
Martini v. Post, 178 Wash. App. 153 (2013)
Parent Document
Martini v. Post, 178 Wash. App. 153 (2013)
Jurisdiction
Washington (state)
Effective Date
2013-11-26

Other Sections in This Document (58)

Full Text

481 chars
¶18 As an initial matter, we consider whether the trial court properly considered the additional evidence Martini submitted with his motion for reconsideration. Martini *162contends the trial court properly exercised its discretion in considering Dr. Kiesel’s declaration and the handprint evidence when ruling on the motion for reconsideration under CR 59(a)(7)-(9). We agree with Martini that the trial court did not err when it considered additional evidence on reconsideration.