DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Rolfs v. Home Depot, 2013 DNH 121 (2013)

Citation
Rolfs v. Home Depot, 2013 DNH 121 (2013)
Parent Document
Rolfs v. Home Depot, 2013 DNH 121 (2013)
Jurisdiction
New Hampshire (state)
Effective Date
2013-09-20
Original Source
https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/10693813/rolfs-v-home-depot/ ↗

Other Sections in This Document (677)

Full Text

447 chars 
Title VII’s antiretaliation provision does not
     “immunize . . . employee[s] from those petty slights
     or minor annoyances that often take place at work and
     that all employees experience,” Burlington N . & Santa
     Fe Ry. C o . v . White, 548 U.S. 5 3 , 68 (2006); rather,
     it seeks “to prevent employer interference with
     ‘unfettered access’ to Title VII’s remedial
     mechanisms,” id. (quoting Robinson v . Shell Oil Co.,