Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Rolfs v. Home Depot, 2013 DNH 121 (2013)

Citation
Rolfs v. Home Depot, 2013 DNH 121 (2013)
Parent Document
Rolfs v. Home Depot, 2013 DNH 121 (2013)
Jurisdiction
New Hampshire (state)
Effective Date
2013-09-20

Other Sections in This Document (677)

Full Text

775 chars
25
    who possessed certain qualities. Eminent authority
    indicates that such a course of action, if proven, may
    constitute discrimination “because of . . . sex.” See
    Phillips v . Martin Marietta Corp., 400 U.S. 5 4 2 , 544
    (1971) (per curiam) (reversing summary judgment and
    holding that an employer may have violated Title VII
    by treating women with pre-school-age children
    differently than men with children of the same a g e ) .
    Riding this horse for all it is worth, the appellant
    identifies the culpable trait - for which men were
    punished but women were not - as either a sexual
    attraction to men o r , alternatively, homosexuality. Id. (parallel citations omitted). If Rolfs is not claiming faithful-spouse discrimination,