DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Rolfs v. Home Depot, 2013 DNH 121 (2013)

Citation
Rolfs v. Home Depot, 2013 DNH 121 (2013)
Parent Document
Rolfs v. Home Depot, 2013 DNH 121 (2013)
Jurisdiction
New Hampshire (state)
Effective Date
2013-09-20
Original Source
https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/10693813/rolfs-v-home-depot/ ↗

Other Sections in This Document (677)

Full Text

477 chars 
9
       Those complaints are two different instances of protected
activity, but there is no reason not to consider them together.
Kelly learned about them simultaneously. Moreover, Rolfs must
show that Kelly knew about those complaints if he is to
establish that Kelly retaliated against Rolfs for making them,
see Medina-Rivera, 713 F.3d at 139, which makes the date on
which Kelly learned of those complaints more important, legally,
than the dates on which Rolfs made them.